logo
 Go Back

Castle Biosciences Presents New Data Demonstrating the Clinical Utility and Value of DecisionDx®-SCC in Moderately and Poorly Differentiated Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Tumors

By AP News - Nov 15, 2022, 07:04 AM ET
Last Updated - Mar 26, 2024, 02:46 PM EDT
CSTL_logo
The data were shared in an oral presentation given at the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) 59 th Annual Meeting by Sarah Estrada, M.D., dermatopathologist with Affiliated Dermatology in Scottsdale, Arizona

Castle Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: CSTL), a company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care, today announced new data showing how the Company’s DecisionDx ® -SCC test can provide objective, independent and significant risk-stratification for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) tumors with uncertainty in differentiation status

FRIENDSWOOD, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov 15, 2022--

Castle Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: CSTL), a company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care, today announced new data showing how the Company’s DecisionDx ® -SCC test can provide objective, independent and significant risk-stratification for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) tumors with uncertainty in differentiation status. The data were shared in an oral presentation given at the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) 59 th Annual Meeting by Sarah Estrada, M.D., dermatopathologist with Affiliated Dermatology in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Sponsored

Overall, these data demonstrate how DecisionDx-SCC can significantly stratify the risk of metastasis in high-risk cSCC patients with an ambiguous tumor differentiation status. Additionally, the study suggests that incorporating the test’s results into clinical cSCC risk assessments could improve risk-stratification and enhance current patient management decisions to improve patient outcomes.

Subjective pathology variability in the histologic grading of cSCC tumors is an important clinical issue, particularly when comparing moderately differentiated tumors. Poor differentiation has been shown to be an independent risk factor associated with poor patient outcomes. 1–3 However, there is a lack of consistency in differentiation assessment 4 which can adversely impact the value of differentiation as a prognostic factor. In fact, the two most widely used cSCC staging systems, American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition (AJCC8) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH), vary on their inclusion of poor differentiation as a risk factor for staging; BWH includes it, while AJCC8 does not.

By continuing to use this site, you agree to our terms and conditions
Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Our Offices
  • 10kInfo, Inc.
    13555 SE 36th St
    Bellevue, WA 98006
    Phone: +1 (425) 414-0184
  • 10kInfo Data Solutions, Pvt Ltd.
    Claywork Create
    11 km, Arakere Bannerghatta Rd, Omkar Nagar, Arekere,
    Bengaluru, Karnataka 560076
    Phone: +91 80 4902 2100
4.2 20250324